Different modes for different situations.
Based on Lyssa Adkins' work, Scrum Masters shift between stances:
Teacher: Sharing knowledge they don't have. "Let me explain how Sprint Planning works."
Mentor: Sharing experience and guidance. "When I've seen teams struggle with this, they often..."
Facilitator: Making group processes easier. "Let's hear from everyone on this topic."
Coach: Helping people find their own answers. "What do you think is causing that?"
Each stance is appropriate in different contexts. The key is intentional choice, not defaulting to your comfort zone.
Default to Coach
When unsure, default to coaching (asking questions). It builds capability rather than dependency. Teach and mentor when the person truly lacks knowledge or experience.
Teaching is appropriate when:
Mentoring is appropriate when:
Facilitating is appropriate when:
Coaching is appropriate when:
A coaching conversation follows a pattern:
1. Build context "Tell me about what's happening." "What have you tried so far?"
2. Explore with questions "What would success look like?" "What's the real challenge here?" "What options do you see?"
3. Generate possibilities "What else could you try?" "If resources weren't limited, what would you do?"
4. Commit to action "What's your next step?" "What might get in the way?" "How will you know if it's working?"
Key principle: Resist the urge to give answers. Even when you know the "right" answer, the learning comes from them finding it.
Developer: 'The standup takes too long.' SM: 'What's making it take so long? What have you tried? What else could work?'
Developer: 'The standup takes too long.' SM: 'Here's how to fix it: use a timer and limit each person to 30 seconds.'